On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Kalle Korhonen > <[email protected]> wrote: > We had a WebInterceptor interface at one time, but removed it since > the servlet Filter interface seemed to satisfy all of our needs. Even > then, WebInterceptor was still Servlet Request/Response specific. > Can you elaborate as to how this might work, with maybe a sample/intro API?
Will do. > My fear is that this approach would require us to replicate the > Filter/FilterChain APIs and would probably break all of the existing > Shiro filter end-user configurations - I don't know if we'd want to > risk that :/ Yes, I understand the risks and that I may be on a loosing end here. However, portlet support is a valid point. Kalle
