Hi Kalle,
Nothing wrong with how you did it, at all. You followed the process.
I was just suggesting that it is also ok to let the rest of the
incubator know that you're holding a vote. Sometimes folks who aren't
following shiro closely will take a look at the release artifacts and
find something that needs to be fixed. This can save some time.
But it's not required to notify the incubator PMC of a running release
vote.
Alan is right that *only* votes of incubator PMC members are binding.
If we get three incubator PMC votes during the project vote, the
incubator PMC vote is a "negative" vote, meaning that no action ==
approval.
Craig
On May 21, 2010, at 11:01 PM, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
Replying to Craig as well. I thought the process is that PPMC votes
first, and only if that's successful, we'd post on the general list
for the incubator PMC to vote on the release. According to
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote
:
"The conventional process is for the podling to follow the usual
Apache process (including TODO: link release vote) and then call for a
Incubator PMC VOTE on the TODO: link general incubator list. "
Also on the same page:
"All votes are welcome, but only those votes by the project's PPMC
members (or IPMC members) count towards the final tally."
Please advice.
Kalle
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Alan D. Cabrera
<l...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
Actually, for a podling, only the Incubator PMC members votes
count, though it's good that the podling PMC, PPMC, also vets and
votes on the release.
We have one vote, me, and I'm sure Craig will jump in as well. If
we don't get three IPMC votes then we have to pass the vote on to
the Incubator. If we do have three binding votes then all we need
to do is to notify the Incubator and wait 72 hours. Either way
it's 72 hours after this vote.
Regards,
Alan
On May 21, 2010, at 7:30 PM, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
+1 (non-binding) (we need one more binding vote).
Kalle
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Les Hazlewood <lhazlew...@apache.org
> wrote:
+1
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com
> wrote:
+1
Regards,
Alan
On May 21, 2010, at 2:30 PM, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
This is the first incubator release for Apache Shiro, version
1.0.0-incubating. The release is made following the standard
Apache/Maven release process as documented at
http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/apache-release.html.
Note
that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
for
convenience.
The first vote failed because the pom.xml ->
http://incubator.apache.org/shiro/static/1.0.0-incubating/team-list.html
developer list was incomplete. This is fixed directly in the
tag and
it's the only change made since the first vote. The binaries are
re-deployed and re-staged.
The issues solved for 1.0.0 (after the project entered Apache
incubator):
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310950&styleName=Html&version=12314078
The tag to be voted upon:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/shiro/tags/shiro-root-1.0.0-incubating/
Staging repo for binaries:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheshiro-005/
Staging site:
http://incubator.apache.org/shiro/static/1.0.0-incubating/
Project website (just for informational purposes, not to be
voted upon):
http://incubator.apache.org/shiro/
Guide to testing staged releases:
http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html
Vote open for 72 hours. Please do examine the source and
binaries before
voting.
[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1
Note that Incubator PMC needs to vote upon the release after a
successful PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
Craig L Russell
Architect, Oracle
http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@oracle.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
