So, what are the next steps towards graduation? Is all that is left is to hold a vote?
Les On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Kalle Korhonen <kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Les Hazlewood <lhazlew...@apache.org> wrote: >> I started by copying-and-pasting bits of the source code shown on the >> website, so our mentors recommended that we get his permission last >> year just in case, which is why that statement is included in the >> existing notice file. As long as the URL for his website remains (his >> 'attribution clause' requested of us), we can remove anything else. > > Yes, assumed so. Rephrased the wording as suggested and committed a new > version. > >>> The Spring source notice is equally straight-forwarded. Spring is >> That line was in there originally because I thought there was an >> attribution requirement by Spring, but I double-checked and that only >> applies to us redistributing their *documentation*. We're definitely >> not doing that, so we can move that part entirely. > > Right, I kept the Spring notice there but rephrased. Both serve more > as courtesy notices as well as for copyrights, which is the primary > purpose of the NOTICE file AFAIK. > > Kalle >
