On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Les Hazlewood <lhazlew...@apache.org> wrote: > So, what are the next steps towards graduation? > Is all that is left is to hold a vote?
The page at http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html gives you a pretty good idea. AFAIK, we don't have any incubation action items left open but the biggest thing before the graduation vote is preparing the resolution. You should be the chair in my opinion. There's a bit of bureaucracy to finish if and once the vote is accepted, but manageable. It'd make sense to follow up with 1.1 release shortly after the graduation to make the most out of free publicity, but given that I'd assume it's still going to be a few weeks before all is set and done, might make sense to start now. Kalle > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Kalle Korhonen > <kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Les Hazlewood <lhazlew...@apache.org> wrote: >>> I started by copying-and-pasting bits of the source code shown on the >>> website, so our mentors recommended that we get his permission last >>> year just in case, which is why that statement is included in the >>> existing notice file. As long as the URL for his website remains (his >>> 'attribution clause' requested of us), we can remove anything else. >> >> Yes, assumed so. Rephrased the wording as suggested and committed a new >> version. >> >>>> The Spring source notice is equally straight-forwarded. Spring is >>> That line was in there originally because I thought there was an >>> attribution requirement by Spring, but I double-checked and that only >>> applies to us redistributing their *documentation*. We're definitely >>> not doing that, so we can move that part entirely. >> >> Right, I kept the Spring notice there but rephrased. Both serve more >> as courtesy notices as well as for copyrights, which is the primary >> purpose of the NOTICE file AFAIK. >> >> Kalle >> >
