On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 12:15 -0600, why the lucky stiff wrote: > On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 09:50:44AM -0500, Dan and Norine Simpson wrote: > > How about symlinks to flesh out to FHS? Then the basic shoes distribution > > remains intact (and the same across distributions) while a reasonably small > > set of distro-specific symlinks would be all that a packager would need to > > worry about. (Other than, um, compilation....) > > This is a great idea, actually. > > /usr/lib/shoes/ruby/lib -> /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/lib > > Later, when I go to add sandboxed Ruby, I can just include > sand_table.so in /usr/lib/shoes/lib. (And possibly libruby.so in > /usr/lib/shoes.)
Yeps, that sounds entirely feasible! May I ask, what will the sandboxing be used for? So that it is possible to execute scripts from the internet and stuff? Bram
