Hi Bluebie, > we are his loyal fleshy unit test. :P Hahaha... that's right! (^^;
> Testing GUI apps is hard. Oh, I see... but... @all, In the Shoes tutorial discussion forum of RubyLearning.org. Yesterday I got a question (suggestion) about unit testing from one of the participants. Is it possible to add the unit testing functonality as the following to Shoes? - Make it possible to start a Shoes app from Ruby. (Without having to type "Shoes my_app.rb"; just "ruby my_app.rb") As long as that is not possible, you can't really startup a Shoes app from the inside of a unit test. (You could call a Shoes app with the backticks, but then you wouldn't have a reference to the app object, I think.) How about this idea? Is it possible or impossible? Regards, ashbb On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Bluebie, Jenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > I thought we were his loyal fleshy unit test. :P > > Testing GUI apps is hard. > > > > On 01/10/2008, at 3:56 AM, Satoshi Asakawa wrote: > > _why et al, >> >> We are now learning Ruby and Shoes on the RubyLearning.org Online Course. >> :) >> >> In the course forum, we were talking about the best way to develop our >> Shoes pplications. Today in the discussion, RSpec and Unit Tests (zentest, >> etc) came up. We wondered what it is that you use, and how? >> >> Could you give us an example? >> >> We'll be so happy to hear that. :) >> >> Thanks, >> ashbb >> >> >
