On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 12:39:41AM +0900, Satoshi Asakawa wrote: > - Make it possible to start a Shoes app from Ruby. (Without having to type > "Shoes my_app.rb"; just "ruby my_app.rb") As long as that is not possible, > you can't really startup a Shoes app from the inside of a unit test. (You > could call a Shoes app with the backticks, but then you wouldn't have a > reference to the app object, I think.) > > How about this idea? Is it possible or impossible?
Yes, it's possible. Someone could write a fake Shoes library that pretends to have all the same methods. I'm really not against testing libraries at all. I just have no idea how it would work. _why
