On 10/10/08, Seth Thomas Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't really see it as a problem. People could name the gems > starting with "shoes-" if they think that would help clarify where > they are meant to be used. Clear documentation would also be a fine > solution.
hmm, you are right. and keeping thins simple is one of Shoes points. we just have to start a trend of saving widgets as rubygems then ;) Emanuel
