Awesome - that worked great. It would be nice if you could specify the name of the output file (for me it just did lib.exe), but it can always be changed afterwards, so not a biggie. Thanks!
chris On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Daniel Zepeda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The packager has a an option to package the whole directory. It's a link, > not a checkbox. It will package up everything within the directory that you > specify. Make sure you are using r1057, as I believe that was the first > published revision that has that option. > DZ > > On Nov 5, 2008, at 12:51 PM, Christopher Small wrote: > > Yeah, I started by trying to package on a 64-bit Vista box, and then after > trying on my mac, I didn't bother checking the console when I ran on another > machine because I figured that it was the same problem, but I've realized > now that it's because there was a file that I required in the script. I can > try just putting the stuff from the required file into the script, but how > would I get the packager to include the files contents in the package? > > chris > > On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 8:51 PM, _why <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 06:18:51PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED]: >> > I am unable to get the package feature of shoes operational on windows >> > vista. >> >> Are you on 64-bit vista? There's a bug I'm hunting down with the >> packager on 64-bit Windows. >> >> _why >> > > >
