Richard Kennedy wrote:


Ah, Richard.  Sorry to edit where you saw no need to.

Connie, if your wish is to be blocked by everybody here on St[,] your [believe you mean "you're"] going about it the right way.   Because one (1) ["one," but not "one" and "(1)"; where is (2)?]  more out break ["outbreak"] of this type/style of "BS" [BS,"]  And ["and"] I along with most of the "NORMAL" ["normal," like Tflan?] ST'ers are going to block you out [believe you need a relevant period here] then ["Then"] we won't have to read your "BS" [another relevant period would do nicely; inside the marks].   I hope that ["is"] plain enough English for you.

Plain enough, but illiterate.

Let it go, Richard. RK Manufacturer's of World Class Golf Club Repair Equipment[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 11:09:09 AM
Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Penley on spines
 


"Harry F. Schiestel" wrote:

> Hi Connie
> 73 words might be the start of a new novel.
> Please have this trash published elsewhere!
> Thanks HarryS

Ah, Harry. It is an illiteracy not to separate "Thanks" and "Harry S." Too,
you might consider not starting a sentence with a number. But, then again, you
probably wouldn't.

Let it go, Harry. There is no defiance for Tflan. Accept it. Save yourself.
 

.




Reply via email to