Re: ShopTalk: Penley on spines

[connie mack rea]

Richard Kennedy wrote: Ah, Richard.  Sorry to edit where you saw no need to. Connie, if your wish is to be blocked by everybody here on St[,] your [believe you mean "you're"] going about it the right way.   Because one (1) ["one," but not "one" and "(1)"; where is (2)?]  more out break ["outbreak"] of this type/style of "BS" [BS,"]  And ["and"] I along with most of the "NORMAL" ["normal," like Tflan?] ST'ers are going to block you out [believe you need a relevant period here] then ["Then"] we won't have to read your "BS" [another relevant period would do nicely; inside the marks].   I hope that ["is"] plain enough English for you. Plain enough, but illiterate. Let it go, Richard. RK Manufacturer's of World Class Golf Club Repair Equipment[EMAIL PROTECTED] -------Original Message-------   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 11:09:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Penley on spines   "Harry F. Schiestel" wrote: > Hi Connie > 73 words might be the start of a new novel. > Please have this trash published elsewhere! > Thanks HarryS Ah, Harry. It is an illiteracy not to separate "Thanks" and "Harry S." Too, you might consider not starting a sentence with a number. But, then again, you probably wouldn't. Let it go, Harry. There is no defiance for Tflan. Accept it. Save yourself.   .