Sorry, ST...I was referencing Brad's PE frequency numbers post from my "golf
information--shafts" file and mistakenly hit send on a message I was writing
behind the open file. If you are using PE's though, Brad had some numbers
worth saving on that post.

Bernie
Writeto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bernie Baymiller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 4:43 PM
Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Shaft Help - SK Pure Energy


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brad Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, August 04, 2002 4:28 PM
> Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Shaft Help - SK Pure Energy
>
>
> > Ed Reeder,
> > I've been on vacation for a couple weeks so this may be too late to
help.
> > I've found that the Pure Energy is very uniform, shaft to shaft and in
> > stiffness in any plane.  With that said, however, there is a certain
> > strangeness that I've found.  The Butt end is very, very stiff compared
to
> > the tip.  This causes weird trimming to be needed if you want to build a
> set
> > of woods-driver and fairways.  My example (freqs with ClubScout III, 5"
> > clamp, no grip):
> > Pure Energy A shafts, all within 2cpm of each other as raw shafts. To
get
> a
> > set of three woods close to the slope (8.6 cpm/inch) I wanted, I had to
do
> > the following with the actual clubheads shimmed on...
> >                 tip trim = freq     tip trim = freq
> > Driver    46.5"   0"        230
> > 3W        43.5"   0"        233        3.5"     253
> > 5W        42.25"  0"        237        5.5"     260
> >
> > The 0", 3.5" and 5.5" tip trims got me the slope I wanted.  But because
> > these are supposed to be, I think, "butt trim to length" clubs, I was
> pretty
> > spooked by the huge trim needed for the 3 and 5W's.  The good news was
> that
> > the client loved them.
> >
> > Another story...wanted 275 cpm 5W @ 42".  Pure Energy R.
> > Tip trim   [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> > 0"          245
> > 1           254
> > 2           260
> > 3           265
> > 4           270
> > 5"          276
> >
> > Hope this isn't too late to be helpful..or maybe it'll be useful to
> someone
> > else
> >
> > Brad Smith
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 7/22/02 6:55 PM, "Ed Reeder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Chris,
> > > Thanks again.  I just want to double check on the flex.  I've
> > > heard conflicting claims on how stiff the PEs play.
> > >
> > > It is the R flex you are recommending as similar to the TaylorMade M
70?
> > >
> > > Thanks for your patience.
> > >
> > > /Ed
> > >
> > > Chris Burns wrote:
> > >>
> > >> 0" tip trim for the driver.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>


Reply via email to