|
"Don't lie to me, Gustav! You're a stinkin' Mac user!!"
-Dogbert
:-)
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 9:09
PM
Subject: Re: ShopTalk: XP SP2
thank the lord for Macintosh!
On 28-Aug-04, at 5:52 PM,
Andy Ruigh wrote:
Tom - there is actually
quite a bit of "concern" about SP2 out there in the profession. Most
of my peers are not installing it in their environments yet. Concerns
I have seen include some issues with apps not functioning after
installation. Personally, I only had a short time of running
it. I didn't have the time to look into it further right now. So
that part of the situation is my fault. /smaller>/fontfamily> /smaller>/fontfamily> As
is often the case in the business world, the question is "is there a
compelling business reason" to update to it? If not, I'll let others
"test" it for me and observe reactions to it. Also, we have entire
custom apps packages created by a third party. They only
"certified" Win2K for them last year. If I install it, and
there are any app problems, the first thing they will tell me is to
uninstall XP. /smaller>/fontfamily> /smaller>/fontfamily> I
remember all of the problems with NT SP6. Luckily, I saw the initial
reaction to it on some sys admin forums, and I waited until SP6a
arrived. Saved my employer downtime and money by dragging my feet
on it. (of course I was chastised at first for it, and commended
later) :-) Such is the life in IT..... /smaller>/fontfamily> /smaller>/fontfamily> -Andy/smaller>/fontfamily> -----
Original Message
-----
From:/x-tad-bigger>/fontfamily>
/x-tad-bigger>Tom and Donna/x-tad-bigger>/color>
/x-tad-bigger>/fontfamily> To:/x-tad-bigger>/fontfamily>
/x-tad-bigger>[EMAIL PROTECTED]/x-tad-bigger>/color>
/x-tad-bigger>/fontfamily> Sent:/x-tad-bigger>/fontfamily>
Friday, August 27, 2004 6:48 PM/x-tad-bigger>/fontfamily> Subject:/x-tad-bigger>/fontfamily>
Re: ShopTalk: Re:/x-tad-bigger>/fontfamily>
I find it interesting
that anyone would have problem with the XP SPII. Other than the long
download time, with DSL if took over 45 minutes, I have not seen or
experience one glitch. Actually I have picked up speed in transition
time between functions. I will admit that I waited three days before I
could muster enough courage to hit the Install button. Tom M
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/color>
wrote:
Foe what ever reason when I downloaded SP2 I could not
access my email via comcast Broadband account. Nowm I have to use my wife's
computor til someone get's the mess squared away! Ah
Progress!
HStill -------------- Original message
--------------
> Hey Guys, > > Please download XP
service Pack II It's now available "Now" as a download. > It may just
solve your problems! That's if you are using XP and if you are > be
prepared for a 45 minute download even if you have cable broadband.
It > has a great "firewall as a bonus! > > > -----
Original Message ----- > From: "Al Taylor" > To: > Sent:
Wednesday, August 25, 2004 4:49 PM > Subject: Re: ShopTalk:
Re: > > > > What I find amazing is that these are
supposedly going through shoptalk. > > They never reach me. Is it
possible that my ISP somehow sees these posts > > as
viruses/worms/etc and stops them? Or are they? I wonder if they
would > > also t! ell me they stopped one. Computers used to be so
simple. Even the > > ones where you had to take your shoes off for
some calculations. > > > > Al > > > > At
04:20 PM 8/25/2004, you wrote: > >>I guess someone on this forum
traced this back to gte.net or mike.org? > >>These msgs get
pruned out by my service provider, so i don't see them > >>on
email, only on Yahoo!, so I can't trace it back (and I'm not quite >
>>sure how to do that anyway). > >> > >>Is it
possible for someone who knows where these are coming from to >
>>email back to mike.org to tell him he has been infected? >
>> > >>Scott > > > > >
> > >
--
"Keep’em
straight and in the middle for lower scores."/bigger>/bigger>/fontfamily>
|