NO! NO! NO! NO! You don't "just build to frequency". Jeez, what the hell are you saying? There are too many parameters to consider other than freq. If it's a joke, put a friggin' smiley after the comment.
I sure hope that isn't how you do it. Wow, how embarrassing that would be. TFlan --- Robert Devino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just build to frequency and forget what a shaft is > labeled > > Sincerely, > Robert Devino > 14252 Delano St. > Van Nuys, Ca. 91401 > (818) 770-0475 > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Monday, August 4, 2008 11:41:18 AM > Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Re: [SpinetalkersForum] Shaft > flex redux > > Clearly you're looking for an argument and I ain't > in the mood to argue. So read my post to Roy, on > shoptalk. > > And play a little closer attention to the meaning of > my post. I simply think mfr's could and should > provide a hell of a lot more information than the > alphabet. Fuji's "A" flex is different than say, > UST's "A" flex, often by a significant amount of > freqs. I further expanded upon the original post to > a couple guys that you might want to take a look at > and ponder. > > I'd very much appreciate a little more positive > input as to what a mfr should/could do with their > products. So far all I've seen it stuff like what > you're offering which frankly, doesn't advance the > discussion. Try a little harder and ask questions or > posit what you think should be included in the info > provided by mfrs, rather than asking me what I'd do. > > > TFlan > > > Tim Hewitt wrote: > I'm not being a wise ass, I'm simply asking you what > you would do with shafts marked 245, 251, 260 on the > butt? This means nothing if they are different shaft > models. Butt frequency by itself does not relate to > how a shaft performs, nor can it be equated to shaft > stiffness or shaft flex. > > What would you do with these numbers that you cannot > do with A,R,S,X today? They are both equally > meaningless. > > -t > > On Aug 4, 2008, at 2:07 PM, Tom wrote: > > > Oh please . . . spare me the tech bullshit. I took a > first shot at it. If you have a better idea present > it rather than being a wise ass. > > TFlan > > > Tim Hewitt wrote:And exactly what do you think this > would tell you? > > > Comparing the butt frequencies of unlike shaft > models tells you nothing more about that shaft than > a letter designator does. > > This is not really going to help - at all... > > -t > > On Aug 4, 2008, at 12:47 PM, Tom wrote: > > > Choose a raw length. Choose a tip weight. Choose a > clamp length. Flick > the assembly. Write down the number and print it on > the shaft. > > >
