--- Tom Eastep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So the packages included are:
>
> shorewall-common
> shorewall-shell
> shorewall-perl
> shorewall-lite
Do you think that future Shorewall releases will
always be as a "bouquet" of X packages (currently 4)
and all having the same version number?
ie.
will shorewall x.x.x
always include
shorewall{-common,-shell,-perl,-lite,-etc...}-x.x.x
My doubt is whether there's a chance (I'd rather hope
not) that eg. shorewall-common-4.6.2 is released but,
say, shorewall-shell-4.6.2 is not because one can keep
using, say, shorewall-shell-4.6.0.
Until now, the various shorewall packages have always
been released together with the same version number.
Is that going to stay the same in the fairly far
future?
As a side question, would the mailing list support
reports of users using shorewall-{subpackage} with
different version numbers (mainly referring to
shorewall-common, -shell and -perl)?
I hope I explained myself correctly.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Get the Yahoo! toolbar and be alerted to new email wherever you're surfing.
http://new.toolbar.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/index.php
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-devel
