--- Tom Eastep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a) shorewall-common requires at least one of the
> compilers.
> b) each compiler requires shorewall-common of at
> least a
> particular version.
>
> Which package do we install first? As things stand
> right now,
> we install the compiler first and the
> shorewall-common
> install script insists that there be a compiler.
Maybe the simplest solution would be that
shorewall-common be a function library which does not
*require* a compiler but of course is almost useless
on its own (unless someone might want to link to it
from another program).
On the other hand, installing "shorewall" would mean
installing either shorewall-shell or shorewall-perl or
both. The latter packages would however require
shorewall-common.
That's just a thought but I don't know shorewall's
coding details so I guess you would have already done
it this way if it were possible at this point in time.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Sick sense of humor? Visit Yahoo! TV's
Comedy with an Edge to see what's on, when.
http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/222
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-devel
