Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 07:19:36AM -0800, Tom Eastep wrote: >> That is still a good suggestion but it has nothing to do with Shorewall >> 4.4 since it isn't something that would be part of the product. > > How likely would it be that shorewall check could catch more errors than > it currently does? I know some things it simply has no way to know if > is right or wrong, but perhaps there is room for more checking than it > currently does. Catching incorrect values would be nice in some cases. > I guess a check for 'is config sane' is the idea. There is no way you > could check for correctness. >
Shorewall-perl already does a lot of value checking. Have you found cases that it is missing? -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-devel
