Natanael Copa wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 07:44 -0800, Tom Eastep wrote:

> 
>> I might spend some time though investigating what it would take to get
>> Shorewall-perl running natively under windows. Would that be an
>> acceptable solution?
> 
> unfortunally no. users are used to be able to log on the webinterface do
> the change, and expect the change to happen there and then. Copying out
> config to a windows machine, need to install a special application
> (perl/cygwin/shorewall), compile and the copy configs back will not work
> for us, unfortunally.

I guess what I was thinking of was an application under Windows that
would make all of the copying transparent.

> 
> miniperl and more RAM is what we will have to do if we want continue use
> shorewall, which might not be too bad.
> 

Let me know if you have problems with Shorewall-perl and miniperl --
I'll be happy to help in working around them.

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep        \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who
Shoreline,         \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like
Washington, USA     \ all of the passengers in his car
http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-devel

Reply via email to