On 19/07/2012 15:31, Tom Eastep wrote:
> It has been my practice for some time to always upload all of the
> packages when one of them changes. This includes patch releases such as
> 4.5.5.3.
>

This is really an argument about whether to version individual 
components or the distribution as a whole...

I just saw an almost identical question on the Perl blogs rss feed - 
can't remember which project it was for, but the question again was 
whether to mark the whole release of all packages with a version, or to 
version the individual components.  Ahh, yes, just remembered, the sub 
issue was then how to put the version numbers into the individual 
modules so that lib-1.2.3 is known to be part of distribution-1.2.5

The majority opinion was that there are some thorny problems with having 
two part version numbers.  I think the same also in your case here, it's 
not obvious to a package dependency system that shorewall-core-1.2.3 is 
acceptable for shorewall6-1.2.5.  Gentoo would typically define the 
dependencies as simple variables that are constructed from the base 
package name you are installing, and so letting these versions get out 
of lockstep would be annoying and extra work (and likely lead to bugs)

My thought would be that generally people on Debian are quite happy 
running shorewall 3.x despite shorewall-4.5 being out.  Don't panic too 
much about their freeze, if users of Debian want to get bang up to date 
they can come upstream and get their packages...  This is a distro 
management problem, not your problem

Cheers

Ed W

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-devel

Reply via email to