On 5/26/13 10:42 AM, "Dash Four" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>> The point I was trying to make is for you to drop the restriction on
>> 'lo'. As I already pointed out, I could have other "local" devices
>> within the 127.x.x.x range, not just 'lo'. I don't mind having to
>> shoe-horn virtual devices (lo:X for example) into the same device/zone
>> either - that's fine by me, no problem.
>It also opens the possibility for me to use more than one device for the
>"local" zone as well - with just "lo" currently allowed, I cannot do that.

What's the point? Are you going to modify the 'local' routing table to use
these other devices? How does that work?

-Tom
You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to
skydive twice.





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service 
that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your
browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic
and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-devel

Reply via email to