On 5/26/13 11:21 AM, "Dash Four" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>Tom Eastep wrote:
>> On 5/26/13 10:42 AM, "Dash Four" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>   
>>>> The point I was trying to make is for you to drop the restriction on
>>>> 'lo'. As I already pointed out, I could have other "local" devices
>>>> within the 127.x.x.x range, not just 'lo'. I don't mind having to
>>>> shoe-horn virtual devices (lo:X for example) into the same device/zone
>>>> either - that's fine by me, no problem.
>>>>       
>>> It also opens the possibility for me to use more than one device for
>>>the
>>> "local" zone as well - with just "lo" currently allowed, I cannot do
>>>that.
>>>     
>>
>> What's the point? Are you going to modify the 'local' routing table to
>>use
>> these other devices? How does that work?
>>   
>We've got three type of embedded devices, which attach themselves to a
>"main" machine (a PC or a server) via the usb port and are able to
>send/receive data in this way.
>
>The usb port acts as usbX interface and for all intents and purposes the
>whole thing is considered to be part of the "main" machine/server. The
>actual usbX devices are created/initiated via the standard Linux tools
>in existence (there is already a set of kernel modules for this type of
>device in the main Linux stack) and that is how we use these and have
>been doing for some time.

Okay -- so it sounds like you really want the 'local' interface option for
these usbX interfaces to inhibit external interaction and nothing else,
right?

-Tom
You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to
skydive twice.





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service 
that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your
browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic
and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-devel

Reply via email to