> > But perhaps instead of just warn the user, and perhaps got people stuck > > out of their boxes I should propose to run the update in any case ? > > > > Is it safe to consider this, I doubt as the changes for example in nat -> > > snat can't be automated and safe in all kind of configuration people can > > have. > > > > Anyway a loop feedback is welcomed to best serve the product and its > > packaging. > > I guess that behavior could be desirable for point release and mayby for > minor release. > > http://shorewall.org/NewRelease.html > > -Matt
Hi Matt, I personnally not found any trouble with the update procedure (except the nat -> snat) changes. Now the quest is are we sure (we as shorewall dealers ;-) to not break a working system. -- Bruno Friedmann Ioda-Net Sàrl www.ioda-net.ch Bareos Partner, openSUSE Member, fsfe supporter GPG KEY : D5C9B751C4653227 irc: tigerfoot _______________________________________________ Shorewall-devel mailing list Shorewall-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-devel
