On dimanche, 13 janvier 2019 19.56:46 h CET Tom Eastep wrote: > On 1/13/19 9:58 AM, Bruno Friedmann wrote: > >>> But perhaps instead of just warn the user, and perhaps got people stuck > >>> out of their boxes I should propose to run the update in any case ? > >>> > >>> Is it safe to consider this, I doubt as the changes for example in nat > >>> -> > >>> snat can't be automated and safe in all kind of configuration people can > >>> have. > >>> > >>> Anyway a loop feedback is welcomed to best serve the product and its > >>> packaging. > >> > >> I guess that behavior could be desirable for point release and mayby for > >> minor release. > >> > >> http://shorewall.org/NewRelease.html > >> > >> -Matt > > > > Hi Matt, I personnally not found any trouble with the update procedure > > (except the nat -> snat) changes. Now the quest is are we sure (we as > > shorewall dealers ;-) to not break a working system. > > Bruno -- what problem did you have with nat -> snat conversion? > > Thanks, > -Tom
Oh just that it was a manual operation, so kind of operation that can't be handled automatically, otherwise work great. -- Bruno Friedmann Ioda-Net Sàrl www.ioda-net.ch Bareos Partner, openSUSE Member, fsfe supporter GPG KEY : D5C9B751C4653227 irc: tigerfoot _______________________________________________ Shorewall-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-devel
