On Sun, 2007-08-04 at 09:59 -0700, Tom Eastep wrote: > > The tarball should always work well on Ubuntu (given that I develop > Shorewall under Ubuntu ;-) )
I have a pretty strict "no make install" rule here though, and might end up rolling by own 3.2.10 .deb because of it. In the meanwhile, is there any way to solve the situation where the shorewall-lite machine keeps it's modules somewhere other than: /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/kernel/net/ipv4/netfilter:/lib/modules/$(uname -r)/kernel/net/netfilter If not yet, do you want to just keep glomming directories onto $MODULESDIR to cover all of the possibilities or make MODULESDIR per-lite-target configurable? b. BTW: are you interested in what my patch to shorewall-lite looks like for openwrt when I am done? -- My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server. Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
