On Mon, 2007-09-04 at 08:29 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > In the meanwhile, is there any way to solve the situation where the > shorewall-lite machine keeps it's modules somewhere other than:
NM. I found it in shorewall.conf. Although having to include the output of the lite target's $(uname -r) is less than optimal, it works. Running through the xtrace output of all of this is very interesting. :-) b. -- My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server. Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
