The remote side admin has requested we source nat all of our local network traffic to avoid network conflicts and such. Trust me, if it weren't a requirement from our remote partner I wouldn't even bother.
-Mike Tom Eastep wrote: > Mike Jaquays wrote: >> Ok, but that wouldn't cause issues with the source NAT would it? > > I'm trying to understand why you have this silly source NAT requirement in > the first place. > > -Tom > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It's the best place to buy or sell services > for just about anything Open Source. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Shorewall-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
