I'll give it a shot. Thanks! -Mike
Tom Eastep wrote: > Mike Jaquays wrote: >> The remote side admin has requested we source nat all of our local >> network traffic to avoid network conflicts and such. Trust me, if it >> weren't a requirement from our remote partner I wouldn't even bother. >> > > Then I would: > > a) Delete the 2.2.2.0/24<->3.3.3.0/24 security policies. > b) Remove the IPSEC 'OPTIONS' from your masq rule. > > -Tom > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It's the best place to buy or sell services > for just about anything Open Source. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Shorewall-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
