On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 12:58 -0800, Tom Eastep wrote:
> 
> Yes -- but that function can blow up the first time that it tries to touch
> its arguments in a numeric context. So it would have to break them into two
> smaller integers without using arithmetic and without the benefit of
> ${foo:a:b} (these toy shells don't support that form of expansion).

How about:

# foo=1.2.3.4
# echo ${foo#*.*.}
3.4
# echo ${foo%.*.*}  
1.2

> That will be ugly and slow.

Not the above.  Or am I missing something?

b.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to