Tom Eastep wrote: > Brian J. Murrell wrote: >> On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 13:12 -0800, Tom Eastep wrote: >>> Please have a look at ip_range() and ip_range_explicit() in lib.base and try >>> to envision recoding them to use that technique. >> I will admit to not having looked all of the use cases. >> >>> Maybe you want to spend >>> your Christmas vacation that way -- I don't. >> :-) >> >>> Yet another question: what does "/bin/sh /sbin/shorewall-lite ipdecimal >>> 2953838592" do? >> # /bin/sh /sbin/shorewall-lite ipdecimal 2953838592 >> 176.16.0.0 >> > > Brian, > > > Attached is a patch to lib.base that attempts to replace the failing tests > with calls to a bc-based function. Please try the "shorewall-lite iprange" > command with this patch installed.
Corrected patch attached (first one broke ip_range_explicit(). -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Public Key \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
