Shorewall Guy wrote: > Craig Kingston wrote: >> My apollogies if this is not the correct forum, we have an old request >> in our problem tracker to modify the default ports in macro.Bittorrent >> to reflect the ports used in the recent versions of Bittorrent. Is >> this something you would consider doing for a future release? What >> would be the appropriate process to request this? >> > > Craig, > > This type of request is better handled on the Shorewall Development > mailing list. > > Be that as it may, the comments in the current macro file reflect our > decision about an earlier request to enlarge the Bittorrent port range. > Are we to understand from this request that the Bittorrent community has > now decided to grab yet another 100 ports? If so, that definitely > strengthens our resolve to not be a party to this continuing escalation.
I've updated the comment in both the 4.0 and 4.2 macros to specify 6881:6999 rather that 6881:6899. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
