Is there any way to practically deal with this other than perhaps adding a comment to the macro?
CRAIG 2009/1/28 Jernej Simončič <[email protected]>: > On Wednesday, January 28, 2009, 0:01:15, Craig Kingston wrote: > >> Out of curiosity, I did a quick search just now and it seems like >> there are those out there who advocate not using that port range at >> all (referring to said conflict with ISPs) so I can appreciate your >> approach - the basics work (sic) and those who want to change it are >> free to. > > There are several trackers that will deny clients which use the > default port range. > > -- > < Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://eternallybored.org/ > > > Actually, it only SEEMS as though you mustn't be deceived by appearances. > -- The Obvious Law > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > SourcForge Community > SourceForge wants to tell your story. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword > _______________________________________________ > Shorewall-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
