On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Mekabe Ramein<[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Tom Eastep<[email protected]> wrote: >> Mekabe Ramein wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am moving my old Shorewall configuration to a new box with new >>> version of Shorewall. >>> Unfortunately I have a problem starting it if I keep the "ULOG" >>> parameter in the following line of rules file. >>> >>> REDIRECT:ULOG wall 82 tcp 80 >>> >>> If I remove the ":ULOG" from that line, Shorewall starts successfully. >>> >>> I am attachig the start trace "shorewall -vv start" output to this email. >>> >>> The given error is : >>> iptables v1.3.5: Need TCP or UDP with port specification >>> Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for more information. >>> ERROR: Command "/sbin/iptables -A log0 -j REDIRECT --to-port 82" Failed >>> >>> >>> What is the problem ? >> >> The attached patch should correct the problem. >> >> patch /usr/share/shorewall/Shorewall/Chains.pm < logging.diff >> >> -Tom > > > Thank you. It really solved the problem. I assume this patch will be > included in the final release, right ? > Btw, ACCEPT rule with ULOG parameter was being accepted while REDIRECT was > not. > > Thanks. >
I just noticed that I receive the following warning when starting Shorewall: WARNING: RFC1918_LOG_LEVEL=ULOG ignored. The 'norfc1918' interface/host option is no longer supported What does that mean ? Should I take any actions ? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
