Mekabe Ramein wrote: > > Thank you. It really solved the problem. I assume this patch will be > included in the final release, right ?
We distribute Betas and Release Candidates in order to identify *and remove* defects before final. > Btw, ACCEPT rule with ULOG parameter was being accepted while > REDIRECT was not. I know. If you read http://www1.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/development/4.4/shorewall-4.4.0-RC2/known_problems.txt, you will find this characterization of the defect: 1) A nat rule (DNAT, REDIRECT, etc.) which changes the destination port number and that has logging specified can cause invalid iptables input to be generated. Example of rule: REDIRECT:ULOG wall 82 tcp 80 Example of error message: iptables v1.3.5: Need TCP or UDP with port specification Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for more information. ERROR: Command "/sbin/iptables -A log0 -j REDIRECT --to-port 82" Failed -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
