>> I'm switching my router/AP from the wireless madwifi driver to the >> in-kernel ath5k driver. Everything seems to work, except I need >> shorewall for NAT and it won't start because it says the loc zone is >> empty. > > That is a Shorewall configuration blunder > >> The only interface in the loc zone is wlan0, which is started >> by hostapd and is up and making connections. Does anyone know why >> shorewall doesn't know wlan0 is up? Shorewall started when I was >> using the madwifi driver and starting the Gentoo /etc/init.d/net.wlan0 >> script, but hostapd needs to start wlan0 when using ath5k in master >> mode. > > If Shorewall is truly telling you that 'loc' is empty, then > > a) That doesn't stop Shorewall from starting. > b) It means that you have NO hosts defined to be in the loc zone. > > -Tom
I get the following when trying to start shorewall: WARNING: Zone loc is empty ERROR: Unable to determine the routes through interface "wlan0" My interfaces file has: loc wlan0 detect tcpflags,detectnets,nosmurfs Where do I need to look for my error? - Grant ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
