> Make sure that you have 'wlan0' defined in your 'zones' file. Are you sure? I have the following zones file and it works fine when using madwifi (ath0) instead of ath5k (wlan0).
fw firewall net ipv4 loc ipv4 - Grant >> >> I'm switching my router/AP from the wireless madwifi driver to the >> >> in-kernel ath5k driver. Everything seems to work, except I need >> >> shorewall for NAT and it won't start because it says the >> loc zone is >> >> empty. >> > >> > That is a Shorewall configuration blunder >> > >> >> The only interface in the loc zone is wlan0, which is started by >> >> hostapd and is up and making connections. Does anyone know why >> >> shorewall doesn't know wlan0 is up? Shorewall started when I was >> >> using the madwifi driver and starting the Gentoo >> >> /etc/init.d/net.wlan0 script, but hostapd needs to start >> wlan0 when >> >> using ath5k in master mode. >> > >> > If Shorewall is truly telling you that 'loc' is empty, then >> > >> > a) That doesn't stop Shorewall from starting. >> > b) It means that you have NO hosts defined to be in the loc zone. >> > >> > -Tom >> >> I get the following when trying to start shorewall: >> >> WARNING: Zone loc is empty >> ERROR: Unable to determine the routes through interface "wlan0" >> >> My interfaces file has: >> >> loc wlan0 detect tcpflags,detectnets,nosmurfs >> >> Where do I need to look for my error? >> >> - Grant ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
