Hi Tom Am 15.04.2011 16:07, schrieb Tom Eastep: > > Please reverse the changes that you made to correct the typo and apply > this patch. "It works for me" :-) >
Reversed and up to DEFROUTE5.diff. "This works for me too" ;-) Havn't found any problems. BTW Why restore a default route in the simple case when no balance is set in providers file? The routing in the main table doesn't change either way when shorewall is running or not if you pretend the user is responsible for providing the default route in this case. I see you used ip -o route ls now ;-) that makes parsing of routes much simpler ... Weekend for me the tests with USE_DEFAULT_RT=Yes are for next week. Greetings Jörg -- CISS TDI GmbH Jörg Kleuver CISS TDI GmbH Tel. +49 2642 97 80 28 Barbarossastraße 36 Fax. +49 2642 97 80 10 53489 Sinzig, Germany Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sinzig AG Koblenz, HR-Nummer 13357 Geschäftsführer: Dipl.-Math. Joachim Figura, Dipl.-Inform. Berthold Bärk ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
