On 05/13/2011 08:13 AM, Mr Dash Four wrote:
> 
>> No -- eth1 and ifb1 are the *only* interfaces involved when 10.1.1.12
>> communicates with 212.58.254.251. eth0 and ifb0 are *not* involved.
>>
>> [...]
>>   
>> In tcrules for eth0, the source IP is 10.1.1.12 and the dest IP is
>> 212.58.254.251.
>>
>> For tcfilters for ifb0, the source IP is 212.58.254.251 and the dest IP
>> is 10.1.2.7.
>>   
> So, in other words, even though only eth1 and ifb1 are involved I have 
> to use eth0 class in tcrules (out of eth0's quota!) and ifb0 class in 
> tcfilters (out of ifb0's quota) to capture and "shape" traffic even 
> though neither interfaces take part in the net flow, is that right?

eth0 and ifb0 are not involved and you need no eth0/ifb0
tcrules/tcfilters for 10.1.1.12<->212.58.254.251 communication.

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep        \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who
Shoreline,         \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like
Washington, USA     \ all of the passengers in his car
http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability
What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know.
Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools
to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to