On 22/05/2011 21:31, Tom Eastep wrote:
> On 5/22/11 9:48 AM, Tom Eastep wrote:
>>
>> On May 22, 2011, at 3:44 AM, Ed W wrote:
>
>>> Does that make sense?
>>
>> Yes -- attached is a similar patch that avoids all of the manipulation of
>> RESTOREFILE.
>>
>
> After applying the patch, the body of the added function needs to be
> modified as follows:
>
> #
> # Determine if there are config files newer than the passed object but #
> uptodate() {
> [ -f $1 ] && [ -z "$(find ${CONFDIR} -newer $1)" ]
> }
Good catch - I will test it with "shorewall" shortly and report back.
Thanks for taking the idea and completing it!
Can I get confirmation you intend to commit to core shorewall for the
next release?
Many thanks!
Ed W
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know!
Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its
next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran
developers boost performance applications - including clusters.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
