On 5/23/11 9:13 AM, Ed W wrote:
> On 23/05/2011 16:34, Tom Eastep wrote:
>> I think it would be a big benefit to factor out the common code in both
>> shorewall/shorewall6 and shorewall-lite/shorewall6-lite. If you want to
>> try to take that on, then I recommend that you clone the git tree so
>> that you can be working with my latest changes.
> 
> Sure - happy to give it a go
> 
> I think we need an initial pass to clean up the easy bits, eg line
> endings, re-orderings and as you correctly say things that are
> equivalent but done differently.
> 
> I develop on OSX and the big missing feature is some decent merge tool
> like Meld...  Anyone got a visual merge suggestion for osx?

Wish I did.

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep        \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who
Shoreline,         \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like
Washington, USA     \ all of the passengers in his car
http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know!
Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its 
next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran 
developers boost performance applications - including clusters. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to