> Forgive me for top-posting, but I am so excited by discussion of new > configuration file formats I just had to. > > I see discussion of JSON, XML, and I feel I must also suggest Sumerian > Cuneiform. Cuneiform is exceedingly compact and not vulnerable to > inadvertent or erroneous changes: > http://salenacastro7.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/cuneiform.jpg > > That says: "mark all outgoing traffic with diffserv to make it go fast > on teh Internet".
Nice, I totally stepped into this one. So many applications have odd names nowadays, so "cuneiform" didn't even sound so bad. Well, maybe the 'Sumerian' bit did raise my eyebrow just enough to get me to click. They are *so* elite. I think they initially used cuneiform to write BSD, later in history. Tom, please do build in support for this format, I think it might be the Next Cool Thing™. Heck, maybe I'll even buy a shirt that says "I write my configs in cuneiform". :) -Mark ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
