On 6/10/12 7:27 PM, Anshuman Aggarwal wrote: > Hi, > Sorry for the late response. Including the thread for context. > > It would work if I could use its local connection as primary and have a > lower priority route via server 2. > > Its the shorewall/interfaces definition that is tripping me up for the > lower priority route to 0.0.0.0 via Server 2 that you mentioned? Also > how will shorewall be used to setup this route using its normal > 'providers', 'interfaces', and 'zone' definition files ? Appreciate help > with that configuration.
You can the 'balance' option on the primary provider and the 'fallback' option on the one with a lesser priority. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
