"Simon Matter" wrote: >I'm not sure I understood exactly but is it so that you'll have one VLAN >interface per client on the box? If so then I think ISC DHCP will work as >long as you make it listening on all those interfaces. It will complain >about it with "Multiple interfaces match the same blabla" but works fine.
Yep, that's it. I'm thinking I might need to run one instance of dhcpd per VLAN, otherwise it will be difficult determining what gets what lease. With one instance/vlan I can just do a subnet declaration for a.b.c.0/24, and define a range with one address in it. Should work, though not the simplest setup to manage ! >Again, if it works as I expected above then I guess it will work. But >that's different than the example because 130.252.100.18 and >130.252.100.19 all share eth1 and not different interfaces. Indeed, I'll be using VLANs on the switch to spearate them. Back at work Monday, so I can start experimenting. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412 _______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
