On 04/11/2018 06:30 PM, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-02-28 at 08:51 -0800, Tom Eastep wrote:
>> There are quite a few, but they are only an issue for people who have
>> to
>> rely on the obscure 'lock' utility. The rest just get a 'stale lock
>> file
>> removed' message the next time that they run shorewall[6][-lite].
>> I'll
>> try to come up with a fix against 5.1.12...
> Did any solutions for this end up making it into 5.1.12?

Did you read the release notes?

Problems corrected:

1)  Previously, the Shorewall[6][-lite] lock file was not always
    released when an error occurred. This resulted in:

    - A warning message saying that a stale lock file has been removed
    - 'lock' processes remaining after shorewall[6][-lite] terminated
      (only reported on OpenWRT).

    That has been corrected so that the lock file is released at exit
    if it hasn't been released already.

Tom Eastep        \   Q: What do you get when you cross a mobster with
Shoreline,         \     an international standard?
Washington, USA     \ A: Someone who makes you an offer you can't
http://shorewall.org \   understand

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
Shorewall-users mailing list

Reply via email to