On 10/10/2018 07:04 AM, Jan Bergner wrote: > Dear shorewall-users list, > > I have some virtual network interfaces due to the fact, I use > systemd-nspawn-containers which get names containing a minus sign. (The > scheme is basically "ve-MACHINE_NAME".) > > Unfortunately, I cannot seem to find any indication on how to treat such > an interface name in, say, a zone assignment. > > In particular, I would like to have an /etc/shorewall/interfaces like this: > > #ZONE INTERFACE BROADCAST OPTIONS > > net eth+ detect dhcp > nspa ve-m1 detect dhcp > nspa ve-m2 detect dhcp > nspb ve-m3 detect dhcp > nspb ve-m4 detect dhcp > oth + detect dhcp > > > However, this does not seem to be working; my interfaces end up in the > oth-zone, as can be expected, since this is my catch-all-zone, assuming > the ve-interfaces are not recognized, properly.) > > Initially, I thought there mus be a simple way of escaping this, but I > could not seem to find it. > > Can someone give me a hint? > > > Thanks in advance and best regards, >
Which Shorewall version are you using? Your interfaces file above is FORMAT 1, which suggests that the version is quite old. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Q: What do you get when you cross a mobster with Shoreline, \ an international standard? Washington, USA \ A: Someone who makes you an offer you can't http://shorewall.org \ understand \_______________________________________________
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
