At 2/6/2025 02:25 PM, Winston wrote:

>Shorewall (and Shorewall6) has been fantastic to me, as a multi-ISP user.  
>I'm deeply indebted to Tom for this fantastic tool, and all the work he put 
>into the documentation especially. Nothing else seems to come close to 
>ease-of-configuration and maintenance.  I'm dreading the day when Debian (or 
>the kernel itself) moves iptables from deprecated to discarded, and I know 
>that nftables is the future, but I'm still yet waiting for something that even 
>comes close before I risk destablizing everything my home system relies upon. 
> Tom, if you're reading this, can I ask - are you still running your own 
>systems, and what you expect to be shifting to yourself?

I have used shorewall since I can't remember. I struggled quite a while (4 
years) trying to find an alternative to shorewall. Nothing was right for me and 
nothing compared to shorewall, until foomuuri came along. Yes, systemd is 
likely needed. foomuuri is still young but I see it as my path forward with 
nftables.

As for iptables going obsolete, on my previous debian (bookworm) router using 
shorewall, typing:

nft list ruleset

I see that the shorewall iptables was converted to nftables anyway via 
iptables-nft. So as long as iptables-nft exists, shorewall should be converting 
to nftables.

I have now converted to foomuuri and find it was relatively painless, including 
ulogd2 logging. I also found adding blocklists fairly convenient with automatic 
daily updates.

https://blog.frehi.be/2024/11/30/protecting-your-server-from-known-bad-ips-with-foomuuri-iplists/

and other things from https://blog.frehi.be/ - a former shorewall user.

Wayne







_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to