Thanks for the tip Winston - particularly relating to the deltas; I suspect 
it's something
relating to docker-shorewall interactions, so I'll try to focus on this.

The host is a VM. The zones we have are:
- Docker (for traffic on the docker bridges)
- Fw for the host/VM
- Net for traffic with source/dest outside the machine

I'll have a look into the change detection methods you flagged to see if I can 
see
something there.

BR,
Sean.


__________________________________
Sean Murphy
Senior Platform Engineer
sean.mur...@datahouse.ch
T +41 44  289-84-22
www.datahouse.ch
Linkedin | YouTube
__________________________________


________________________________________
From: Winston Sorfleet <w...@romanus.ca>
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2025 6:23 PM
To: shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net 
<shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] Problems accessing host from docker container 
running on host
 
[You don't often get email from w...@romanus.ca. Learn why this is important at 
https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]

Pending my previous question about whether the VM and the host are in
the same zone, you might bet some clues from doing

shorewall start; iptables -S > /tmp/shorewall_on

shorewall clear; iptables -S > /tmp/shorewall_clear

diff /tmp/shorewall_on /tmp/shorewall_clear


On 2025-03-20 06:23, Simon Matter wrote:
>> Thanks Matt.
>>
>> Yes - if I do a shorewall clear, it's possible to access the host from
>> inside the docker container. The
>> default docker iptables config seems to support this. However, when I
>> enable shorewall (with docker
>> support), it's not possible.
>>
>> It really seems like some interaction between the docker iptables
>> functionality and the shorewall
>> iptables functionality is causing the problem and more specifically, on
>> the return path from the service
>> running on the host to the docker container.
> Maybe you have to configure docker so that it doesn't fiddle with the
> iptables config?
>
> Simon
>
>> It could be something of an edge case as mostly the point of having
>> containers is to have (some)
>> isolation from the host but we think it prob should be possible to eg
>> access stuff from inside the
>> containers which is accessible from anywhere on the internet.
>>
>> Thanks for any insights.
>>
>> BR,
>> Sean.
>>
>> __________________________________
>> Sean Murphy
>> Senior Platform Engineer
>> sean.mur...@datahouse.ch
>> T +41 44  289-84-22
>> www.datahouse.ch
>> Linkedin | YouTube
>> __________________________________
>>
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Matt Darfeuille <m...@shorewall.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 8:19 PM
>> To: shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> <shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] Problems accessing host from docker
>> container running on host
>>
>> [You don't often get email from m...@shorewall.org. Learn why this is
>> important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>>
>> On 3/19/25 10:49, Sean Murphy via Shorewall-users wrote:
>>> Hi all,,
>>>
>>> We have been (ab)using shorewall for some years now and we're v happy
>>> with it -
>>> thanks everyone and Tom in particular for such a great tool.
>>>
>>> We have been using it to manage security for a set of VMs running
>>> applications
>>> with docker-compose. Almost all of our hosts have a single external
>>> network
>>> interface; this is perhaps not the use case for which shorewall was
>>> designed
>>> but it has been working for us so far.
>>>
>>> We now have a scenario which is proving more difficult: we want to
>>> access a
>>> service running on a host from within a container.
>>>
>>> We have tried the most open configuration possible - a policy with
>>> all:all
>>> ACCEPT and no rules; it seems the service is accessible from anywhere
>>> except
>>> inside the docker container.
>>>
>>> Accessing the service from inside the container results in timeouts, so
>>> presumably
>>> the packets are being dropped somewhere. We tried ping, ssh (on standard
>>> ports)
>>> and an http service running on a high port number.
>>>
>>> Zone configuration:
>>> root@dhit-disposable01:/etc/shorewall# cat zones
>>> ###############################################################################
>>> #ZONE           TYPE      OPTIONS
>>> IN                      OUT
>>> #
>>> OPTIONS                 OPTIONS
>>> fw              firewall
>>> net             ipv4
>>> dock            ipv4
>>>
>>> Interface configuration:
>>> root@dhit-disposable01:/etc/shorewall# cat interfaces
>>> ###############################################################################
>>> ?FORMAT 2
>>> ###############################################################################
>>> #ZONE   INTERFACE                 OPTIONS
>>> net     eth                       physical=eth+,dhcp,nosmurfs
>>> net     en                        physical=en+,dhcp,nosmurfs
>>> dock    docker0                   physical=docker+,routeback=1
>>> dock    br                        physical=br-+,routeback=1
>>>
>>> Policy configuration:
>>> root@dhit-disposable01:/etc/shorewall# cat policy
>>> #SOURCE        DEST        POLICY      LOGLEVEL    LIMIT
>>> all            all         ACCEPT
>>>
>>> Rules configuration:
>>> root@dhit-disposable01:/etc/shorewall# cat rules
>>> #ACTION      SOURCE                  DEST       PROTO      DPORT
>>> # No rules
>>>
>>> Docker configuration as per shorewall.conf
>>> root@dhit-disposable01:/etc/shorewall# grep -i docker shorewall.conf
>>> # Default shorewall config, except for DOCKER=Yes (and this comment).
>>> DOCKER=Yes
>>> DOCKER_BRIDGE=docker0
>>>
>>> I did shorewall compile, safe-reload and then restarted the docker
>>> deamon but
>>> the packets still seem to be being dropped. I tried iptables-tracer [1]
>>> to get some
>>> info on where they disappear and it seems packets are being dropped on
>>> the
>>> return path.
>> If you do a `shorewall clear`, does it work at all?
>>
>>
>> Note that the project is unmaintained.
>>
>> --
>> Matt Darfeuille <m...@shorewall.org>
>> Unmaintained project, no more releases or bug fixes
>> Community: https://sourceforge.net/p/shorewall/mailman/message/37107049/
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Shorewall-users mailing list
>> Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Shorewall-users mailing list
>> Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Shorewall-users mailing list
> Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
>


_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to