The scrolledwindow/scrollbar warnings may be a red herring; sometimes these kinds of warnings appear with different themes/custom GTK modifications (i.e. global menu). I don't recall anyone else reporting them.

The Directory Subimage / top pointer / IFD warnings are from Exiv2 and are nothing to worry about.

The "unable to fetch preview" warnings indicate what you think they indicate, your thumbnails are being generated on-demand.

The get_pixbuf_with_options assertion is, obviously, an issue. The source of the issue appears to be:

gdk_pixbuf_scale_simple: assertion 'GDK_IS_PIXBUF (src)

If you could follow the instructions at https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Shotwell/ReportingABug, that would be a huge help.

-- Jim

On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:58 PM, Michael Hendry <[email protected]> wrote:

On 4 Sep 2014, at 17:30, Michael Hendry <[email protected]> wrote:

On 4 Sep 2014, at 16:59, Michael Hendry <[email protected]> wrote:

I’ve recently upgraded to Ubuntu 14.04, and installed Shotwell 0.18.1.

After a short spell of “Updating library” there is a period during which I can use Shotwell, but after a total of about a minute, the display greys out, and the program shuts down.

 If I run Shotwell from the command line I get this:


(shotwell:3394): Gtk-WARNING **: GtkScrolledWindow 0x11707130 is mapped but visible child GtkScrollbar 0x8b54798 is not mapped

(shotwell:3394): Gtk-WARNING **: GtkScrolledWindow 0x11707130 is mapped but visible child GtkScrollbar 0x8b54798 is not mapped

(shotwell:3394): Gtk-WARNING **: GtkScrolledWindow 0x11707130 is mapped but visible child GtkScrollbar 0x8b54798 is not mapped

(shotwell:3394): Gtk-WARNING **: GtkScrolledWindow 0x11707130 is mapped but visible child GtkScrollbar 0x8b54798 is not mapped
 **
ERROR:/build/buildd/shotwell-0.18.1/src/Photo.vala:3330:photo_get_pixbuf_with_options: assertion failed: (pixbuf != null)
 Aborted (core dumped)


 Any advice? Suggestions as to further investigation?

 Regards

 Michael



 Here are a couple of further examples...

 michaelhendry@ubuntu:~$ date;shotwell;date
 Thu Sep  4 17:20:55 BST 2014

(shotwell:2483): Gtk-WARNING **: GtkScrolledWindow 0x1173c168 is mapped but visible child GtkScrollbar 0x8b88798 is not mapped

(shotwell:2483): Gtk-WARNING **: GtkScrolledWindow 0x1173c168 is mapped but visible child GtkScrollbar 0x8b88798 is not mapped
 **
ERROR:/build/buildd/shotwell-0.18.1/src/Photo.vala:3330:photo_get_pixbuf_with_options: assertion failed: (pixbuf != null)
 Aborted (core dumped)
 Thu Sep  4 17:22:15 BST 2014


 michaelhendry@ubuntu:~$ date;shotwell;date
 Thu Sep  4 17:22:28 BST 2014
 **
ERROR:/build/buildd/shotwell-0.18.1/src/Photo.vala:3330:photo_get_pixbuf_with_options: assertion failed: (pixbuf != null)
 Aborted (core dumped)
 Thu Sep  4 17:24:34 BST 2014
 michaelhendry@ubuntu:~$

 …which might help to explain the problem.

Looking at memory use - when Shotwell is first run, about 12% of the available RAM is taken up, and this doesn’t go back down after the crash.

Subsequent runs of Shotwell seem not to affect RAM usage, which remains around 12%.

 Michael


I thought Shotwell had mended itself yesterday, as it didn’t crash for many hours, and I was able to do a lot of tidying up and tagging jobs.

Full of confidence, I shut Shotwell down and rebooted Ubuntu - the crashes came back.

Starting up my iMac this morning, I had another go, and here’s what happened (I started it using the command-line “date >> crash.log;shotwell 2>>crash.log;date >> crash.log”).


Sun Sep  7 07:28:54 BST 2014

(shotwell:2390): Gtk-WARNING **: GtkScrolledWindow 0x124a8180 is mapped but visible child GtkScrollbar 0x98db798 is not mapped

(shotwell:2390): Gtk-WARNING **: GtkScrolledWindow 0x124a8180 is mapped but visible child GtkScrollbar 0x98db798 is not mapped

(shotwell:2390): Gtk-WARNING **: GtkScrolledWindow 0x124a8180 is mapped but visible child GtkScrollbar 0x98db798 is not mapped

(shotwell:2390): Gtk-WARNING **: GtkScrolledWindow 0x124a8180 is mapped but visible child GtkScrollbar 0x98db798 is not mapped

(shotwell:2390): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_scale_simple: assertion 'GDK_IS_PIXBUF (src)' failed L 2390 2014-09-07 07:30:21 [CRT] dimensions_for_pixbuf: assertion 'GDK_IS_PIXBUF (pixbuf)' failed
**
ERROR:/build/buildd/shotwell-0.18.1/src/Photo.vala:3428:photo_get_pixbuf_with_options: assertion failed: (scaled_to_viewport.approx_equals(Dimensions.for_pixbuf(pixbuf), SCALING_FUDGE))
Sun Sep  7 07:30:28 BST 2014
Sun Sep  7 07:33:18 BST 2014
**
ERROR:/build/buildd/shotwell-0.18.1/src/Photo.vala:3330:photo_get_pixbuf_with_options: assertion failed: (pixbuf != null)
Sun Sep  7 07:36:21 BST 2014


My (apparently) successful run yesterday generated a large number of warnings like those above, and also...

L 8654 2014-09-06 15:02:36 [CRT] Directory SubImage1: Next pointer is out of bounds; ignored.
L 5689 2014-09-06 13:06:31 [CRT] Iop pointer references previously read Photo directory. Ignored.

L 5689 2014-09-06 13:06:31 [CRT] Directory Thumbnail: IFD exceeds data buffer, cannot read entry count.
Part of the tidying up process I went through yesterday involved the recreation of about 15000 thumbnails, which I dealt with by scrolling slowly through the whole library, following the generation of lots of messages like this:

L 3922 2014-09-05 18:35:53 [CRT] EventDirectoryItem.vala:109: Unable to fetch preview for Event [669/88896] Sun 7 Jan, 2001: Failed to open file '/home/michaelhendry/.cache/shotwell/thumbs/thumbs360/thumb0000000000006702.jpg': No such file or directory

(I had copied the database across from a previous installation of Ubuntu, but hadn’t copied the thumbnails).

I have a suspicion that the problem is with the photo.db database - is there a utility or a procedure which would allow me to check its integrity?

I have spent many tens of hours on my Shotwell library, and am prepared to spend many more if necessary, to continue to use it.

Michael

_______________________________________________
shotwell-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/shotwell-list

Reply via email to