I'm trying to figure out Shotwell's world view. If I choose "copy" when importing, the path of the original is lost and replaced with a path based on date.
I won't be copying, the path structure has meaning and I don't want it discarded. If Shotwell detects a duplicate file it is ignored. I can see this makes sense if copying, not so much if linking. I would prefer if Shotwell didn't have an opinion on what files to ignore, and photo.db represented an accurate representation of my collection. Some of my duplicates are mistakes and I'd like Shotwell to help me weed, other dupes are for a reason. Does this sound reasonable? Thanks, Kent _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list [email protected] http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
