It should say 0.7.2+trunk. But if you're seeing the Play Video command, I suspect you're running the right version.
-- Jim On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:14 AM, naren <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the wiki, I have got it compiled and I am testing it. I noticed > that the about box still says, 0.7.2 for the version... or did I get the > wrong source? I see the menu item for "Play Video" so I am guessing this is > the correct branch. > > = > Naren > > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Adam Dingle <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 12/11/2010 06:14 AM, Andrea Carpani wrote: > > > >> On 12/11/2010 04:35 AM, Jim Nelson wrote: > >> > >>> We've been working diligently on Shotwell 0.8 and are looking to begin > >>> wrapping up this release. Several exciting features have been added as > >>> well > >>> smaller additions and bug fixes. This release includes such features > as: > >>> > >>> * Video support, including uploading videos to various Web services > >>> (including YouTube) > >>> * Runtime monitoring and auto-import of the library directory > >>> * Metadata (tags, titles, rating) written to master files automatically > >>> * Flagging files for batch operations > >>> * Set multiple photos to desktop background slideshow > >>> * ... and more! > >>> > >> I've built trunk successfully (Ubuntu Maverick, no additional libraries) > >> and I'll be happy to test it, but on my laptop I'm already using the > >> "Maverick" version of shotwell: is there a way I can test the trunk side > >> by side the stable shotwell? > >> > >> I've installed the trunk on a separate directory and I know I can change > >> the datadir with -d option, but what about cgonf preferences? Is there a > >> way I can start the trunk without polluting the "stable" conf? > >> > > > > Not at this time. You can run two versions of Shotwell side by side and > > they will share the same GConf keys, and this should be mostly OK. Both > > versions, however, will have the same library directory (specified via > > "Import photos to:" in the preferences dialog). This means that any > photos > > you import from a camera into one version will be visible in the other. > You > > should also be aware that the trunk version of Shotwell will write > metadata > > to photo files if you tell it to, so if you're sharing photos between > > Shotwell 0.7.2 and Shotwell trunk then the trunk build may be writing to > > files in your 0.7.2 library. We think this is reasonably safe today, but > > it's still a trunk build - caveat emptor. :) > > > > In the future, we may store a separate import directory for each profile > > (i.e. data directory), or even an entirely separate set of GConf keys for > > each profile; see http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/2146 . This would reduce > > the potential interaction between two versions running side by side if > you > > use a separate profile for each version. > > > > adam > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Shotwell mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list [email protected] http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
