Ah, sure enough there is the +trunk. Since I was looking for the version, I guess I sub-consciously filtered out the non numeric characters on that page!
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Jim Nelson <[email protected]> wrote: > It should say 0.7.2+trunk. But if you're seeing the Play Video command, I > suspect you're running the right version. > > -- Jim > > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:14 AM, naren <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks for the wiki, I have got it compiled and I am testing it. I noticed >> that the about box still says, 0.7.2 for the version... or did I get the >> wrong source? I see the menu item for "Play Video" so I am guessing this >> is >> the correct branch. >> >> = >> Naren >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Adam Dingle <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > On 12/11/2010 06:14 AM, Andrea Carpani wrote: >> > >> >> On 12/11/2010 04:35 AM, Jim Nelson wrote: >> >> >> >>> We've been working diligently on Shotwell 0.8 and are looking to begin >> >>> wrapping up this release. Several exciting features have been added >> as >> >>> well >> >>> smaller additions and bug fixes. This release includes such features >> as: >> >>> >> >>> * Video support, including uploading videos to various Web services >> >>> (including YouTube) >> >>> * Runtime monitoring and auto-import of the library directory >> >>> * Metadata (tags, titles, rating) written to master files >> automatically >> >>> * Flagging files for batch operations >> >>> * Set multiple photos to desktop background slideshow >> >>> * ... and more! >> >>> >> >> I've built trunk successfully (Ubuntu Maverick, no additional >> libraries) >> >> and I'll be happy to test it, but on my laptop I'm already using the >> >> "Maverick" version of shotwell: is there a way I can test the trunk >> side >> >> by side the stable shotwell? >> >> >> >> I've installed the trunk on a separate directory and I know I can >> change >> >> the datadir with -d option, but what about cgonf preferences? Is there >> a >> >> way I can start the trunk without polluting the "stable" conf? >> >> >> > >> > Not at this time. You can run two versions of Shotwell side by side and >> > they will share the same GConf keys, and this should be mostly OK. Both >> > versions, however, will have the same library directory (specified via >> > "Import photos to:" in the preferences dialog). This means that any >> photos >> > you import from a camera into one version will be visible in the other. >> You >> > should also be aware that the trunk version of Shotwell will write >> metadata >> > to photo files if you tell it to, so if you're sharing photos between >> > Shotwell 0.7.2 and Shotwell trunk then the trunk build may be writing to >> > files in your 0.7.2 library. We think this is reasonably safe today, >> but >> > it's still a trunk build - caveat emptor. :) >> > >> > In the future, we may store a separate import directory for each profile >> > (i.e. data directory), or even an entirely separate set of GConf keys >> for >> > each profile; see http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/2146 . This would >> reduce >> > the potential interaction between two versions running side by side if >> you >> > use a separate profile for each version. >> > >> > adam >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Shotwell mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >> > > _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list [email protected] http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
