Adam Dingle wrote: > > On 07/19/2010 08:21 AM, Peter DO Smith wrote: >> 1) Hidden files. Good idea. There are many reasons for having hidden >> files. > > If you think we should allow the user to hide photos *and* independently > allow the user to mark photos as rejects, we could discuss that here, > though my personal opinion is that it would be overkill to have both. I > like the Rejected concept since it is integrated with the rating system > (unlike hiding photos, which would be independent of it). > >
Hi to all. I think that «hidden» and «rejected» are very different concepts: I am using the «hidden» tag in f-spot, for the reasons explained above and more (i.e. photos with my girlfriend) and I would like to see this feature implemented in Shotwell (I'm moving away from f-spot). The rejected photos are likely to be deleted eventually, but the hidden photos are not. I guess that if the photos are tagged with «hidden» the feature can be implemented as a reverse filter (i.e. with the «NOT» operator). Also I don't know the actual state of the tag filters, so correct me if I am wrong. Thanks for the good job, Piergi -- View this message in context: http://shotwell.3510.www.nabble.com/Shotwell-Shotwell-0-7-plan-tp16487p36158.html Sent from the Shotwell mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list [email protected] http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
